snehakr1603 wrote:
I eliminated C. Need help to understand what's wrong about my thought here.
I understand the cost reduction coming from the omission of engineering processes. However, with diatoms occurring naturally, I figured there would/could be costs of obtaining these diatoms from nature. And we have no information on how big or small that cost could be, and whether it could even surpass the cost saving from engineering processes. Hence I found option C not indicating clearly enough that the overall production cost woulddecrease.
Your concerns are valid, and (C) certainly does not PROVE that Smith-Diatom will be able to produce low-cost electricity from dye-sensitive solar cells. But we don't need proof -- we're only looking for the BEST answer choice. In this case, we want the answer choice that most strongly supports the hypothesis that the plan will work.
The passage talks about production of electricity using diatoms and how it would be more efficient than current methods. So if you have
...
Statistics : Posted by GMATNinja • on 27 Apr 2019, 02:40 • Replies 24 • Views 30818
![Chad Lawson – Awakening: The Stillness Within (2026) [FLAC 24bit/48kHz]](http://imghd.xyz/images/2026/05/09/x5d03jw9bi367_600.jpg)
