B is actually an extreme answer because of the use of the word"always"
Premise: Retroviral injections prove to be the only effective means of treating some seriousdiseases.
Premise: Nevertheless , itcannot be stated that retroviral injections are always beneficial for human health,( i.e. NOT alwaysbeneficial)
Premise: since they(Retroviral injections) are known to reduce immune system activity in somecases,
Premise: and persons with reduced immune system activity are likely to be afflicted by various infectious diseases.
Which of the following statements can be properly inferred from the passageabove?
[color=#2e3192] So the question is basically
...
TheGraceful wrote:
krabbymatty wrote:
So (B) says 'Treatment of some serious diseases always results in reduced immune system activity,' but the passage states 'it cannot be stated that retroviral injections are always beneficial for human health, since they are known to reduce immune system activity in somecases ' Don't these two statements contradict each other or am Ihallucinating?
Premise: Retroviral injections prove to be the only effective means of treating some seriousdiseases.
Premise: Nevertheless , itcannot be stated that retroviral injections are always beneficial for human health,( i.e. NOT alwaysbeneficial)
Premise: since they(Retroviral injections) are known to reduce immune system activity in somecases,
Premise: and persons with reduced immune system activity are likely to be afflicted by various infectious diseases.
Which of the following statements can be properly inferred from the passageabove?
[color=#2e3192] So the question is basically
...
Statistics : Posted by unicornilove • on 18 Mar 2020, 04:17 • Replies 11 • Views 6926
