Let us break down the argument and understand it in a betterway:
After performing poorly on multiple tests and receiving a failing grade in a particular course, a student appealed the grade to a university's Office of Academic Affairs(UOAA).
The student claimed that the tests did not cover subject matter highlighted in the classlectures.
The question asks to determine the validity of the student'sclaim.
Possibleanswer:
Comparison of desired events may prove that the student's claim deviates from the actualsituation.
(A) Compare the student's test scores with those of other students in the class. -Incorrect
After performing poorly on multiple tests and receiving a failing grade in a particular course, a student appealed the grade to a university's Office of Academic Affairs(UOAA).
- Student performed poorly on multipletests.
- Thus, the student received failinggrade.
- So the student appealed the grade to theUOAA.
The student claimed that the tests did not cover subject matter highlighted in the classlectures.
- Claim: The student says that the tests did not cover the subject matter highlighted inlectures.
The question asks to determine the validity of the student'sclaim.
Possibleanswer:
Comparison of desired events may prove that the student's claim deviates from the actualsituation.
(A) Compare the student's test scores with those of other students in the class. -Incorrect
- This won't be a preferred way to determine the correctness of the student'sclaim.
- This method can result in a biasedresult.
...
Statistics : Posted by RutujaDeshmukh19 • on 23 Jun 2015, 04:31 • Replies 6 • Views 10141




.jpg)



