notshynotme wrote:
Explanation
[textarea] 4. The author’s attitude toward Planck’s development of a new hypothesis about atomic processes can most aptly be describedas
Explanation
The author clearly admires Planck for his contribution to physics, and of the five choices(E) best reflects that admiration. Yes, “scholarlyinterest” sounds rather neutral and clinical, but look at the writing. Neutral and clinical seems aboutright.
(A) is half-right (in its admiration for Planck’s intuitive leap) and half-wrong (in its suggestion that Planck reinforced, rather than supplanted, classical wavetheory).
(B) neglects to note that Planck held a position that was “then bizarre” (lines38–39) . In any case it would be odd for our author to evidence surprise, mild or otherwise,
...
Statistics : Posted by Sajjad1994 • on 22 Jun 2021, 19:30 • Replies 14 • Views 6029







.jpg)
