HiGMATIntensive KarishmaB MartyMurray DmitryFarber
It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengersbetter
I know that This arguement has gone further and made the Necessary conditional type of conclusion. For me, It mixes cause/effect and conditional at the same time. Can I made the remark in my tracker that when arguement gist is related to correlation causation then no matter how conclusion is made/drafted we just need to focus on that Correlation - causation thing and should check the impact of options from arguement reasoning's view and not just conclusion's ? or is there something else that I should know/follow?
Kindly can you help ?
Thanks !
...
Quote:
It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengersbetter
I know that This arguement has gone further and made the Necessary conditional type of conclusion. For me, It mixes cause/effect and conditional at the same time. Can I made the remark in my tracker that when arguement gist is related to correlation causation then no matter how conclusion is made/drafted we just need to focus on that Correlation - causation thing and should check the impact of options from arguement reasoning's view and not just conclusion's ? or is there something else that I should know/follow?
Kindly can you help ?
Thanks !
...
Statistics : Posted by SnorLax_7 • on 29 Sep 2003, 03:46 • Replies 21 • Views 36849
