Critical Reasoning (CR) | Biologist: In Region X, the average horn mass and body length of adult

­MartyMurray Great explanation! I did get this one right. However, I chose C by method of elimination.

Can both of you pease review my answer?MartyMurray KarishmaB Thankyou.

A.  the second is an observation for which a causal explanation is presented. (Incorrect, second is an intermediate / subsidiaryconclusion)
B.  The first is a premise supporting thesecond (Incorrect, the first one is not apremise)
D.  the second is a premise that independently supports the mainconclusion  (Incorrect, the second one is not a premiseeither)
E.  the second provides further evidence to support thatexplanation   (Incorrect, the second one is not an evidence)
C. the first describes a phenomenon for which the main conclusion presents an explanation; the second is a subsidiary conclusion supporting the main conclusion (Closeenough.)

I thought that the first BF is the main conclusion.
"The cause is probably regulations prohibiting hunting of smaller animals" - sounded like the premise
...

Statistics : Posted by Engineer1 • on 09 Dec 2023, 03:17 • Replies 3 • Views 1706

---