Vartika2525 wrote:
Can someone explain why D is wrong?
(D) says that OTSI's competitors have been almost as successful as OTSI with their investments in the Nadurian market. That implies that OTSI did BETTER than its competitors! And even if the competitors did just as well as OTSI, that wouldn't change the fact that OTSI also did well.
The conclusion is that any investor wanting to make money in the Nadurian market will do well by investing with OTSI. What happened with the competition doesn't change what happened with OTSI: they did well in the past, so we expect them to do well in the future (even if competitors also do well).
(A) is a much better answer -- if we lose the person responsible for the past success, then we have no reason to expect that the success will continue.
I hope that helps!
Statistics : Posted by GMATNinja • on 18 Feb 2024, 06:19 • Replies 4 • Views 1085





