saicharansingh wrote:
Why is B wrong?
No statistically significant difference is what the stimulus mention.
If half of the children who were given sugar remain calm and the other half exhibit HA. Wouldn't that just be cancellation of the entire affect of sugar causing HA in children?
I understand that the option B says "some" but still, this makes more sense to me.
Also, sugar and sugar substitutes - the inference seems a bit far-fetched
I like your angle of approach! l think why B doesn't weaken the argument because it overlap exactly what the argument stated: "We can now dismiss the widely held suspicion that sugar consumption often exacerbates hyperactivity in children with attention deficit disorder."
Choice B cannot weaken this argument because it states explaination of how sugar comsumption exacerbates Hyperactivity.
Statistics : Posted by qianxia5 • on 14 Sep 2021, 01:10 • Replies 5 • Views 3459
![Chad Lawson – Awakening: The Stillness Within (2026) [FLAC 24bit/48kHz]](http://imghd.xyz/images/2026/05/09/x5d03jw9bi367_600.jpg)
