Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Editorial: Supporters of the proposed law that would require bicyclist

The flaw is that the argument does not address the original point, but rather justifies not implementing the rule using other alternatives on which no action has yet been taken.

On this basis options C, D, E can be easily eliminated.

We are left with option A and B.
In option A too there is/are no "other ways to die" explicitly mentioned based on which the recommendation of giving up cigarettes can be termed as silly. Hence eliminate (doesn’t correspond to the flaw in the question)

Anser: Option B

Statistics : Posted by CodingGmat • on 12 Mar 2024, 10:15 • Replies 1 • Views 390

---