Critical Reasoning (CR) | At a recent meeting on environmental threats off the coast of the stat

The argument says the following


"mitigate the risk of excessively restrictive controls, is that"
This means that the author wants an option that mitigated the risk of excessively restrictive controls which means he wants some controls in place so isn't option D better suited

If the answer is A then why D is wrong pls help explain as D is sort of bringing in a reason to doubt so that excessive controls are not put in place

Posted from my mobile device

Statistics : Posted by divyansh843 • on 05 Apr 2024, 01:30 • Replies 2 • Views 399

---