This type of problem——in which you have to find the answer choice that follows the same logical 'formula' as the original passage (like being given an algebraic formula involving variables x, y, and z, and looking for the same formula with variables a, b, and c instead)——is a pillar of LSAT logical reasoning, but is rare on the GMAT (...so, in your studying, don't prioritize this problem type over any of the more common GMAT CR types).
By 'same formula' here, I really do mean SAME formula. If the original passage gives three different examples of something, for instance, the correct answer should contain exactly three analogous examples. Likewise for other 'specs' of the original argument.
If you can actually write this 'formula', you should not have trouble determining which answer choice conforms toit.
.
Here...
By 'same formula' here, I really do mean SAME formula. If the original passage gives three different examples of something, for instance, the correct answer should contain exactly three analogous examples. Likewise for other 'specs' of the original argument.
If you can actually write this 'formula', you should not have trouble determining which answer choice conforms toit.
.
Here...
Quote:
Editorial: Supporters of the proposed law that would require bicyclists to wearhelmets are seriouslymisguided . The number of pedestrians
...
...
Statistics : Posted by RonPurewal • on 12 Mar 2024, 10:15 • Replies 3 • Views 569



.jpg)




