I believe the correct answer is B)
The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of the argument.
As we can see in the argument, the professor acknowledges the following "The author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople is based on the assumption that the position of present-day structures constitutes evidence of medieval street alignment." Then proceeds to state a potential objection, and provides evidence to undermine it "Some may claim that later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment, but there is no archaeological evidence to support this."
The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of the argument.
As we can see in the argument, the professor acknowledges the following "The author's reconstruction of the street system of medieval Constantinople is based on the assumption that the position of present-day structures constitutes evidence of medieval street alignment." Then proceeds to state a potential objection, and provides evidence to undermine it "Some may claim that later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment, but there is no archaeological evidence to support this."
Statistics : Posted by celialem • on 11 Apr 2024, 06:09 • Replies 3 • Views 284
.jpg)
