The banker's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the ground stated in option E:
E. It fails to adequately address the possibility that an increase in the number of banks of one kind in the banker's country will not lead to the complete elimination of banks of another kind.
The banker argues that the community lending laws will soon "entirely cease to serve its intended purpose" because an increasing number of banks exist solely online and are not physically located in any specific community.
However, this argument fails to consider the possibility that even as online-only banks increase, traditional brick-and-mortar banks located in physical communities may still exist. The increase in one type of bank does not necessarily mean the complete elimination of the other type.
The other options do not directly address the vulnerability in the banker's reasoning:
A is about the location of brick-and-mortar banks, which is not the focus of the criticism.
B assumes that
...
E. It fails to adequately address the possibility that an increase in the number of banks of one kind in the banker's country will not lead to the complete elimination of banks of another kind.
The banker argues that the community lending laws will soon "entirely cease to serve its intended purpose" because an increasing number of banks exist solely online and are not physically located in any specific community.
However, this argument fails to consider the possibility that even as online-only banks increase, traditional brick-and-mortar banks located in physical communities may still exist. The increase in one type of bank does not necessarily mean the complete elimination of the other type.
The other options do not directly address the vulnerability in the banker's reasoning:
A is about the location of brick-and-mortar banks, which is not the focus of the criticism.
B assumes that
...
Statistics : Posted by amritbharadwaj • on 22 Sep 2019, 10:47 • Replies 28 • Views 32263
