What we reallyneed -> is a reason to support the idea that the economic historians' assumption still works despite the recentdiscovery.
To be morespecific -> something that suggests that the discovery of redware still being used in the 1860's does not go against the assumption that all the redware potteries closed earlier (in the1840's).
In otherwords -> What can explain the fact that redware was still being used in the 1860's despite no production of redware pottery (because the redware potteries closed in the1840's)?
Choice D -> redware pottery was known for its exceptional durability
Ah! This can explain why redware pottery was still in use in the 1860's despite no such pottery being produced in that time period. Redware pottery made decades earlier (1840's or earlier), thanks to the "exceptional durability", continued to be used in the 1860's.
Choice D makes sense in my view.
Cheers!
...
To be morespecific -> something that suggests that the discovery of redware still being used in the 1860's does not go against the assumption that all the redware potteries closed earlier (in the1840's).
In otherwords -> What can explain the fact that redware was still being used in the 1860's despite no production of redware pottery (because the redware potteries closed in the1840's)?
Choice D -> redware pottery was known for its exceptional durability
Ah! This can explain why redware pottery was still in use in the 1860's despite no such pottery being produced in that time period. Redware pottery made decades earlier (1840's or earlier), thanks to the "exceptional durability", continued to be used in the 1860's.
Choice D makes sense in my view.
Cheers!
...
Statistics : Posted by HarshR9 • on 14 Apr 2024, 10:17 • Replies 6 • Views 312












