Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Reading Comprehension (RC) | Re: Jury nullification occurs when the jury acquits the defendant in a cri

$
0
0
 
hmandhan wrote:

Can you please post explanations for 3, 4 and5?

Explanation


[textarea] ­5. Which one of the following is a criticism that the author of passage A would be likely to offer regarding the suggestion in passage B that juries are justified in nullifying when they view a case as too trivial to result in aconviction?

Explanation


The question is asking for something that the author of passage A would say to weaken passage B’s assertion that it’s okay for juries to nullify when they view cases as too trivial. The correct answer will be the statement that is best supported by evidence in passageA.

A.No. Passage A does not mention prosecutors, so no inference can be made about what the author of passage A would say aboutthem.

B.No. Passage A does not mention prosecutors, so no inference can be made about what the author of passage A would say aboutthem.

C.No. Passage A does not discuss the likelihood of juriesagreeing.

D.No. Passage A does not discuss jurorexpertise.

[color=#27ae60]
...

Statistics : Posted by Sajjad1994 • on 23 Feb 2023, 07:00 • Replies 4 • Views 2823



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>