Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Primatologist: Monkeys and apes of most species groom

$
0
0
Aryaa03 wrote:

Please explain this GMATNinja KarishmaBMartyMurray

On these questions, you always want to start by cutting straight to the heart of the passage. Here, the conclusion is that the main function of grooming in apes monkeys is social cohesion.

So what are those bold parts doing? The first seems like evidence or a premise, informing us that in many species grooming goes way beyond what's necessary to keep fur pristine. The second also seems like a premise: grooming isn't about health benefits.

Put another way, the bold portions support the conclusion by pointing out what grooming isn't really used for -- it's not just about keeping the fur nice and shiny, and it's not just about health benefits.

To theanswers!
Quote:

(A) The first is an observation for which an explanation is provided; the second is a conclusion for which support isprovided.

Nope. The second boldface statement is definitely not a conclusion. Kill(A).
Quote:
(B) The first is an explicitly supported conclusion, but
...

Statistics : Posted by GMATNinja • on 11 Apr 2024, 04:15 • Replies 6 • Views 629



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>