A) The first describes a phenomenon the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is the explanation that the argument concludes is correct.
"the explanation of which is at issue in the argument" - not true. Hence reject.
B) The first describes a phenomenon the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second provides evidence in support of a proposed explanation of that phenomenon.
"the explanation of which is at issue in the argument" - not true. Hence reject.
So, it's among C, D, E.
The main conclusion is - "Thus, a company's long-term profitability might be better protected by not outsourcing."
Intermediate conclusion - "the continuity of supply and thus of their own operations could be threatened"
The line "Companies that outsource generally dismantle some of their capabilities" provides evidence for the intermediate conclusion.
C) The first defines a key term used throughout the argument; the
...
"the explanation of which is at issue in the argument" - not true. Hence reject.
B) The first describes a phenomenon the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second provides evidence in support of a proposed explanation of that phenomenon.
"the explanation of which is at issue in the argument" - not true. Hence reject.
So, it's among C, D, E.
The main conclusion is - "Thus, a company's long-term profitability might be better protected by not outsourcing."
Intermediate conclusion - "the continuity of supply and thus of their own operations could be threatened"
The line "Companies that outsource generally dismantle some of their capabilities" provides evidence for the intermediate conclusion.
C) The first defines a key term used throughout the argument; the
...
Statistics : Posted by nsomayaj • on 03 Apr 2024, 22:06 • Replies 11 • Views 1404
.jpg)
