MartyMurray wrote:
singh760 wrote:
Bunuel could u please provide clarification as to why E is the answer and notC?
(E) weakens the argument, by showing that there is an additional factor, dividend payouts, that may offset some of the losses of VBMF and thus cause returns to investors from VBMF to be better than those from other funds.
At the same time, (C) also weakens the argument, by indicating that, while VBMF may have declined in value last year, it did not decline in value as much as most other funds, and thus (C) casts doubt on the idea that "by investing in VBMF, one can lose at least as much money as one can lose by investing in any other mutual fund."
So, this question is a busted question with two correctanswers.
Sir I believe E is right.
Explanation:
The argument say VBMF are stock based mutual funds and it is being compared to other mutual funds (MF) (Not mentioned only stock based so assumming all forms of the MF)
C says it performed better than other forms Stock based MF (this leaves
...
Statistics : Posted by thr3at • on 31 Jan 2023, 06:02 • Replies 9 • Views 3155
.jpg)
