HiMartyMurray ,
Still finding it difficult to accept C. Question stem's premise is that a higher proportion (5% vs 3%) of drivers involved in accidents have P.
Therefore, P increases likelihood of fatal car accident.
(C): So what if P is only diagnosed after individuals get into accidents? It still shows that they had P but only found out about it later. Though it is unclear whether they had P before the accident orafter.
Still finding it difficult to accept C. Question stem's premise is that a higher proportion (5% vs 3%) of drivers involved in accidents have P.
Therefore, P increases likelihood of fatal car accident.
(C): So what if P is only diagnosed after individuals get into accidents? It still shows that they had P but only found out about it later. Though it is unclear whether they had P before the accident orafter.
MartyMurray wrote:
Among people in Tiravia who had a fatal car accident while driving, 5 percent of those under 50 years old were found to have prosinopsis, a currently untreatable eye disease that causes a gradual deterioration in peripheral vision. Yet, according to medical records, only 3 percent ofTiravians under 50 have been diagnosed with prosinopsis. Therefore, when a Tiravian driver under 50 has prosinopsis, the disease significantly increases the likelihood that the driver will have a fatal caraccident.
The passage presents an argument with the following
...
The passage presents an argument with the following
...
Statistics : Posted by unicornilove • on 12 Mar 2024, 00:42 • Replies 6 • Views 1419










