ashutosh_73 wrote:
HiKarishmaB AjiteshArun MartyMurray ,
I know (B) is a very common sense answer, but i am not sure how to eliminate this option.
Here is what i think about (B):
So, the correct answer to a flaw question will act like a necessary assumption, right?
Okay, argument says: YOU PROFITED --> HENCE YOU WERE BEHIND THE ACT.
Now, if i say: Hey, i was not the only one who profited. There are 10 more guys whoprofited.
Won't the above boldfaced statement severely weaken the logic of theargument?
This is a flaw question. You don't have to try to weaken it. You have to find the flaw in the author's argument. You have to say what he did wrong.
If I say, "YOU PROFITED --> HENCE YOU WERE BEHIND THE ACT"
You have to say what mistake I committed. So you have to say, "You are failing to consider the possibility that a party can benefit from an event without helping to bring about that event"
You have to highlight the mistake i have made in my reasoning. Can you say
...
Statistics : Posted by KarishmaB • on 08 May 2024, 08:58 • Replies 2 • Views 137
.jpg)
