Elite097 wrote:
in choice E, the factt hat customers are resistant to new styles, doesnt it weaken the conclusion since buying competitors will not make sense any more as consumers are resistant to new styles
In a sense, buying a competitor involves taking over the competitor's business.
The competitor's business involves selling carpet. So, a competitor in the carpet industry must be selling carpet of styles that consumers have been buying.
Thus, while buying a competitor may results in the buying company selling styles that are new to the buying company, the styles are not new to consumers.
So, (E) does not bring up any problem with the strategy of buying competitors because that strategy does not involve selling carpet of styles new to consumers.
Statistics : Posted by MartyMurray • on 23 Apr 2015, 06:30 • Replies 12 • Views 14958
.jpg)





