Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Professor: The author's reconstruction of the street system of

$
0
0
MartyMurray wrote:

B. The first is meant as a concession to a position that the argument rejects; the second is meant to undermine a potential objection to a premise of theargument.

The first part of this choice is correct. After all, in saying that an assumption that supports "the author's reconstruction" is "not an reasonable assumption," the first boldfaced portion concedes that at least part of "the author's" reasoning, which the argument rejects, is reasonable.

The second part of this choice is correct as well since the second boldfaced portion indicates that the objection "later structures replaced earlier ones on the same alignment" is not supported by evidence. In other words, the second boldfaced portion serves to "undermine" thatobjection.

Keep.

 

Is there any objection to the "premise" of the argument? I believe there is an objection to the reasoning but no objection to the premise. What do you think?
...

Statistics : Posted by ChiranjeevSingh • on 11 Apr 2024, 06:09 • Replies 6 • Views 1184



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>