Pranjall8 wrote:
Urban rail systems have been proposed to alleviate traffic congestion, but results in many cities have been cited as evidence that this approach to traffic management is ineffective. For example, a U.S. city that opened three urban rail branches experienced a net decline of 3,100 urban rail commuters during a period when employment increased by 96,000. Officials who favor urban rail systems as a solution to traffic congestion have attempted to counter this argument by noting that commuting trips in that city represent just 20 percent of urban travel. The response of the officials to the claim that urban rail systems are ineffective is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
A. presents no evidence to show that the statistics are incorrect
B. relies solely on general data about U.S. cities rather than data about the city in question
C. fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic
...
A. presents no evidence to show that the statistics are incorrect
B. relies solely on general data about U.S. cities rather than data about the city in question
C. fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic
...
Statistics : Posted by Bunuel • on 29 May 2024, 12:54 • Replies 1 • Views 45









