Bunuel wrote:
This editorial cannot be a good argument because it is barely literate. Run-on sentences, slang, and perfectly dreadful grammar appear regularly throughout. Anything that poorly written cannot be making very much sense.
Which of the following identifies an assumption in the argument above?
(A) This editorial was written by someone other than the usual editor.
(B) Generally speaking, very few editorials are poor in style or grammar.
(C) The language of an argument is indicative of its validity.
(D) Generally speaking, the majority of editorials are poor in style and grammar.
(E) The author of the editorial purposely uses poor grammar to disguise what he knows is a badargument.
[textarea] This is a CR ButlerQuestion
Which of the following identifies an assumption in the argument above?
(A) This editorial was written by someone other than the usual editor.
(B) Generally speaking, very few editorials are poor in style or grammar.
(C) The language of an argument is indicative of its validity.
(D) Generally speaking, the majority of editorials are poor in style and grammar.
(E) The author of the editorial purposely uses poor grammar to disguise what he knows is a badargument.
[textarea] This is a CR ButlerQuestion
- Check the links to other ButlerProjects:
- Data SufficiencyButler
- Problem SolvingButler
- Sentence CorrectionButler
- Reading ComprehensionButler
- [url=https://gmatclub.com/forum/ir-butler-2021-practice-2-ir-questions-everyday-343475.html] Integrated
...Statistics : Posted by Bunuel • on 26 Apr 2024, 01:30 • Replies 3 • Views 638




