Vanshikakataruka wrote:
I agree with the explanation above but wont D make a better weakener?
As per my understanding, D is saying "If a child eats a food that makes him allergic, he will still have the migraine as an adult even without eating that food". So wont this make a better weakener? because it states that yes Food is the reason for migraine and this is the reason elimination of that food from that diet didnt work- because once u had it, u will get migraine even if uremove.
The author argues that "some other cause of migraine headaches besides food allergies must exist."
Here's(D):
Quote:
(D) Very few patients have allergic migraine reactions as children and then live migraine-free adult lives once they have eliminated from their diets foods to which they have been demonstrated to beallergic.
(D) actuallysupports the author's argument -- the children eliminated the problematic foods, and yet theystill get migraines as adults. This heavily implies that the food is not the only
...
Statistics : Posted by GMATNinja • on 13 Sep 2014, 07:52 • Replies 16 • Views 29180
