Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low

$
0
0
I would say Avi has hit it square on the head! Pat does provide evidence to support his claim, and D says that Pat did not provide evidence. 

Now the evidence is *flawed* (per all the discussion about this problem), but it is stillprovided. 
avigutman wrote:
Contropositive wrote:
HiReedArnoldMPREP avigutman I found Pat's argument a crappy one, and i chose (D), but later i found that none of the posters found (D) objectionable. Now, i wonder whether i am the only one who read (D) in a very crappy way.
Please help with my understanding of(D):

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve thesituation , because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teachingengagements.

Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve thesituation . Since very few judges teach or give
...

Statistics : Posted by ReedArnoldMPREP • on 14 Jan 2008, 12:32 • Replies 52 • Views 52625



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>