KarishmaB wrote:
Vinitkhicha1111 wrote:
I agree withchristoph and IMO option A is more pertinent here as compared with B because in B the words "outweighed by" aren't correct and imply as if the pollution (negative aspect) is dominating over or surpassing the financial benefits (desirable outcome) WHEREAS the correct lingo should have mentioned that the pollution (negative aspect) OUTWEIGHS the financial benefits (desirable outcome) obtained by using the snowmobiles .Moreover, the environmentalist argues that the financial benefits as such can be obtained ( although degree of the benefit isn't known) through inviting the skiers by reducing the sound and noise pollution by use of snowmobiles. Other members, please provide your opinions regardingthis.
Responding to a pm:
The correct option here is (B) and here is why:
Environmentalist: Ban snowmobiles because they create air pollution
Business guy: Snowmobiling brings tourists and hence money. So, economics dictate that we put up with the
...
Statistics : Posted by Ratikainen • on 20 Dec 2005, 00:06 • Replies 22 • Views 47160
