Hmm, this question is a bit sketchy. Sure, C can be eliminated, and most folks are missing the easiest way to do it. We can stop right at "many." We don't care what *many* people will do; we care what happens overall. So even if we ignore the "industrialized" part (which *is* also a problem), C fails because it doesn't tell us much about what will happen overall. It's like trying to say the president won't be re-elected because many people will vote for someone else. Fine, I'm sure they will, but that tells me nothing about who will win, and C tells us nothing about whether the population will peak sooner. We don't even know whether having 4 children is a lot!
B is definitely the only answer that comes close, but we have a problem. We don't know that the proposal is actually at odds with experts' predictions in the first place! All we know is that the population is supposed to peak sometime in mid-century. We don't know exactly when, nor do we know what the peak population
...
B is definitely the only answer that comes close, but we have a problem. We don't know that the proposal is actually at odds with experts' predictions in the first place! All we know is that the population is supposed to peak sometime in mid-century. We don't know exactly when, nor do we know what the peak population
...
Statistics : Posted by DmitryFarber • on 04 Aug 2010, 06:04 • Replies 28 • Views 8604
