sayan640 wrote:
KarishmaB MartyMurray
Kindly explain this question.
Is it following the causal pattern ?
Cause -> Effect
Reading Sartore's Review -> Realization of aptness to watch the movie
kindlyelaborate.
This argument is not a cause-effect argument. This part of the passage, "A person who is likely to enjoy a particular movie is much more likely to realize this by reading a review by Sartore than a review by Kelly," is not the conclusion of the argument. It's stated as a fact that supports the conclusion.
The conclusion of the argument is thefollowing:
Sartore is a better movie reviewer thanKelly.
We see that the argument is not about what Sartore's reviews cause. It's about what Sartore is, a better reviewer.
Then, the support for the conclusion works in the following way.
The support begins by defining what a movie review shoulddo:
A movie review should help readers determine whether or not they are apt to enjoy themovie
Then, the conclusion that Sartore is the
...
Statistics : Posted by MartyMurray • on 21 Apr 2018, 02:00 • Replies 14 • Views 7054
