Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 5): Nutritionist Claim: It has been

$
0
0
To question the nutritionist's conclusion that regulating school cafeteria offerings would not significantly impact overall teenage snack consumption, we need an option that suggests the study's findings might not fully capture the teenagers' snack consumption patterns. Specifically, we should look for evidence that the study's measure of snack consumption at school does not provide a complete picture.

Option D states:

D. The study measured only the snacks consumed within school hours and did not account for additional consumption immediately before or after school.

This option seriously calls into question the nutritionist's conclusion because it highlights a limitation in the study's scope. If teenagers are consuming a significant amount of unhealthy snacks immediately before or after school, then regulating the cafeteria offerings could still influence their overall consumption patterns. The nutritionist's conclusion hinges on the assumption that the study's findings are comprehensive,
...

Statistics : Posted by jairovx • on 12 Jul 2024, 07:00 • Replies 50 • Views 794



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>