ChiranjeevSingh wrote:
joshnsit wrote:
The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
(A) The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies wereburied.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
(A) The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies wereburied.
Let me explain why option A is wrong.
First of all, the following version of A would be correct:
The tetracycline deposits did not form from the tetracycline that entered into the bodies after the bodies were buried.
This version is correct because the negation of this option would mean that the tetracycline deposits we see today are the result of the tetracycline
...
Statistics : Posted by PReciSioN • on 30 Jun 2012, 16:05 • Replies 22 • Views 32562





