This is definitely not one of ours. It's from Manhattan Review (an unrelated group), and I don't think it's valid.
The original version actually uses "populations" in both C and E, and the official explanation eliminates C solely on the grounds of concision. This is not likely to happen on the GMAT. In fact, one could easily counter-argue that "which were" adds clarity, making it easier to see immediately that we are characterizing the cities rather than the destruction.
In
...
The original version actually uses "populations" in both C and E, and the official explanation eliminates C solely on the grounds of concision. This is not likely to happen on the GMAT. In fact, one could easily counter-argue that "which were" adds clarity, making it easier to see immediately that we are characterizing the cities rather than the destruction.
In
...






.jpg)



