hongson1706 wrote:
I don't really get the reasoning of the passage. Please explain.
The argument is as follows:
Premise 1: Poisons kill both rats and wildlife.
Premise 2: Wildlife is protected by law.
Conclusion: Poisons cannot be used to kill rats...... (BF2)
Counter-view: Poisons should be used to kill rats irrespective of harm to wildlife. (BF1)
Thus correct answer is E.
Please let me know, if you still have doubts.








.jpg)

