I chose B. But C is the correct answer.
B is incorrect because regardless the profit of competitors, the MH grew the profits from 10% to 35% for last 3 years which is a good sign for the company hence the reward would have been justified.
C suggests the profit were huge because the spending was low.
B is incorrect because regardless the profit of competitors, the MH grew the profits from 10% to 35% for last 3 years which is a good sign for the company hence the reward would have been justified.
C suggests the profit were huge because the spending was low.
