Quantcast
Channel: GMAT Club Forum - Forums > Reading Comprehension (RC)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: A mathematical theorem proved by one mathematician should not

$
0
0
sillyboy wrote:

I'm unable to decipher the argument. Please explain in simple terms.


Once one realizes that in option E, the pronoun "that" refers to "verification", then the question would be easier to comprehend.

Premise: In most computer-assisted proofs there are astronomically many types of instances to survey, andno human being could review every step in the proof .

Conclusion: computer-assisted proofs involving astronomically many types of instances should not be accepted.

The basic
...

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 291973

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>