sayantanc2k wrote:
sleepynut wrote:
Hi experts,
Kindly request for help!!
The argument start from the fact that the Kerniand's government provides some restriction to ensure a low-cost supply.Then,it provides the plausible negative outcome.Followed by the second piece of information is the government's claim that this restriction helps alleviate the urban unemployment.
"HOWEVER" in the last sentence introduces the shift that the policy may actually
contributed to urban unemployment.
Doesn't
policyKindly request for help!!
The argument start from the fact that the Kerniand's government provides some restriction to ensure a low-cost supply.Then,it provides the plausible negative outcome.Followed by the second piece of information is the government's claim that this restriction helps alleviate the urban unemployment.
"HOWEVER" in the last sentence introduces the shift that the policy may actually
contributed to urban unemployment.
Doesn't
...
.jpg)






