OreoShake wrote:
I dont why A is incorrect - what does it have to do with tax rate rising and unemployment falling?; its irrelevant. Please help. Thanks.
The argument states the following:
1992:Money available for unemployed people = M1 (5%), No. of unemployed people N1 (high).
1998: Money available for unemployed people = M2 (8%) , No. of unemployed people N2 (low).
M2>M1, and N2<N1.
A straight mathematical explanation for the above is:
M2/N2 > M1/N1
i.e. each person receives more money in 1998 than
...
.jpg)






