AR15J wrote:
I have read in one of the expert's posts that usage of had and after/before is redundant. When "after" is used, use of "had" is not required. Therefore, I rejected choice A
Please help !
Your concept is absolutely correct. There should not have been past perfect "had visited", because there is already "after" depicting the sequence. The correct sentence would be:
" ......after he visited..." (simple past).
...
.jpg)
