HKD1710 wrote:
Thiseditorial cannot be a good argument because it is barely literate. Run-on sentences, slang, and perfectly dreadful grammar appear regularlythroughout. Anything that poorly written cannot be making very much sense.
Which of the following identifies an assumption in the argument above?
(A) This editorial waswritten by someone other than the usual editor.
(B) Generally speaking,very few editorials are poor in style or grammar.
(C)The language of an argument is indicative of its validity
...
.jpg)
