abhimahna wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
abhimahna wrote:
Argument states
Outlaw motorcycle gangs --> Blaming --> media sensationalism--> for growing public clamour . Reason ( banning tattoo parlours run by bikers in city A).
Evidence used : Last year, only 0.37 percent of all offences are committed by bikers.
We need to evaluate this argument.
A) What percentage of regular traffic rules violators sport atattoo? --> IRRELEVANT
B) What percentage of the 0.37 percent of the offences were committed by the outlaw gang members?--> They are citing 0.37% as the evidence. If very few of these crimes were by gang members, then their point is invalid. if more than 50% of these were by gang members, then it means they point is valid. Earlier it was very less by them and now it has increased. So, may be their point is valid.
Outlaw motorcycle gangs --> Blaming --> media sensationalism--> for growing public clamour . Reason ( banning tattoo parlours run by bikers in city A).
Evidence used : Last year, only 0.37 percent of all offences are committed by bikers.
We need to evaluate this argument.
A) What percentage of regular traffic rules violators sport atattoo? --> IRRELEVANT
B) What percentage of the 0.37 percent of the offences were committed by the outlaw gang members?--> They are citing 0.37% as the evidence. If very few of these crimes were by gang members, then their point is invalid. if more than 50% of these were by gang members, then it means they point is valid. Earlier it was very less by them and now it has increased. So, may be their point is valid.
...
.jpg)
