niteshwaghray wrote:
Please explain why C is a better option than B.
In my opinion, the assumption laid out in option B best supports the conclusion that raising the prices by 10% will makeup for the shortfall in the store's income. Option C seems much more indirect than option B.
Though not an expert, I will try to explain the twist here.The essence of the argument is, the changes, i.e. 10% hike in price, should not alter(rather increase) the shoplifting rate.
Let's break the argument.
If shoplifting at ToySMart
...





