Tan2017 wrote:
While i get why D could be the answer (considering it provides statistical evidence) I am not entirely convinced. Since the stem states that the "conservation group is trying to convince Americans that thereturn of gray wolves to the northern United States is a positive development" isn't it possible that the wolves could have been responsible for killings prior to the "500 period" and the lack of documented killing is due to their absence.
Can anyone please clarify this
...
.jpg)
