GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) | Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government

my issue with this Q is the OA assumes a lot: (1) that the unemployed becomes employed and then (2) assumes the newly employed get higher paid jobs. i'm looking for something that weakens the idea that unemployed have no financial incentive to accept jobs for govt supplement, i want something that deals w/ this, not deals w/ (well what if these unemployed ppl become employed and what if this also happens?)