IMO it's D
The logic to be weaken is
New tax law incentive>more students from state> financial boost.
1. Doesn't change any situation with the new change.
2. Out of scope
3. It gets better for students but doesn't say anything for or against the financial situation.
4. Broader application pool is financially more beneficial than tax incentives. Restricting it to state will hurt that. So it's the critique against legistrators' logic.
5. Same as 3
Sent from my BLN-L22 using GMAT Club Forum
...
The logic to be weaken is
New tax law incentive>more students from state> financial boost.
1. Doesn't change any situation with the new change.
2. Out of scope
3. It gets better for students but doesn't say anything for or against the financial situation.
4. Broader application pool is financially more beneficial than tax incentives. Restricting it to state will hurt that. So it's the critique against legistrators' logic.
5. Same as 3
Sent from my BLN-L22 using GMAT Club Forum
...








