adityapareshshah wrote:
avi1787 wrote:
Someone please explain how B is incorrect.
Drivers 65 and older do not constitute a significantly larger percentage of licensed drivers in Wareland than drivers ages 18-24 do.
Yes, if we negate this, and take this scenario.
total licensed drivers-1000
65 and older- 700
under 24- 100
others-200
3% of 700, is ~20
10% of 100 is ~10
So there are more number of older drivers who are involved in serious accidents which breaks the argument that they are safer
Although the questionDrivers 65 and older do not constitute a significantly larger percentage of licensed drivers in Wareland than drivers ages 18-24 do.
Yes, if we negate this, and take this scenario.
total licensed drivers-1000
65 and older- 700
under 24- 100
others-200
3% of 700, is ~20
10% of 100 is ~10
So there are more number of older drivers who are involved in serious accidents which breaks the argument that they are safer
...



.jpg)



