Hi - can someone please explain the argument for me please
This statement is confusing me ..is the conclusion saying
a) the agricultural output is reduced because of a lack of water supply ?
OR
b) is somehow the water needed for the existing output somehow reduced ?
--------------------------
"As a result, many farmers in these areas are likely to reduce their output as the water supply they need in order to maintain production shrinks"
This statement is confusing me ..is the conclusion saying
a) the agricultural output is reduced because of a lack of water supply ?
OR
b) is somehow the water needed for the existing output somehow reduced ?
--------------------------
"As a result, many farmers in these areas are likely to reduce their output as the water supply they need in order to maintain production shrinks"
