chesstitans wrote:
It is quite confusing to identify the conclusion and premises of the argument. => the conclusion is the luxurious condonium and small businesses.
B talks about "statewide" => out of scope
E states that city must be revitalized so that small businesses thrive => out
D is wrong because we know nothing about how tax revenue will help the city
Oh! thank you for clearing it out! Appreciate it?
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
.jpg)
