Shiv2016 wrote
Hello daagh
Will option A be correct if it used the correct idiom?
Will twice and more be considered redundant?
Look at this. Twice of 20 is 40; twice of 20 cannot be 40 and more than 40 at the same time.
Quote:
Hello daagh
Will option A be correct if it used the correct idiom?
Will twice and more be considered redundant?
Look at this. Twice of 20 is 40; twice of 20 cannot be 40 and more than 40 at the same time.
![FLO – Therapy at the Club – Pre-Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Music221/v4/a4/11/88/a41188ed-0f2e-e8d5-1163-d59e373cc58c/26UMGIM30046.rgb.jpg/208x208bb.webp)
.jpg)
