aniteshgmat1101 wrote:
gurpreetsingh wrote:
I think the answer should be D. If you negate it, the conclusion is weakend.
How can E be true? the potential builders are not same as landowners.
How can E be true? the potential builders are not same as landowners.
Hi Guruprit,
Could you please explain how negating D weakens theconclusion???
Thanx.
hello,
it might be very late response , see the main purpose in argument that the author wants that if landowners become more selective then govt. has to spend less amount for repair as subsidy ,so in option D even if there is no diff. in subsidies provided
...
.jpg)
