chesstitans wrote:
this is so unbelievable, the lesson here is to recognize the pattern and try not to pay attention to outside knowledge. Clearly, test takers have to assume that there is a technology to prevent catastrophe in the conclusion of the argument.
That's the beauty of this question.
The author said an increase in temperature would displace people. That means he is assuming that we cannot save them anyhow.
This is what option A is
...










